搜索结果: 1-9 共查到“理论语言学 a reply”相关记录9条 . 查询时间(0.109 秒)
that is not how you agree:a reply to zeijlstra
syntax, agreement phi-features long-distance agreement
2015/9/6
In a recent paper, Zeijlstra (2012) argues that the theory of agreement should be revised
so that the direction of valuation would always be downward: the element that contributes
the value (e.g. in...
Differentiation and integration in human language:A reply to Marslen-Wilson and Tyler
Differentiation and integration human language Marslen-Wilson Tyler
2015/6/19
Differentiation and integration in human language:A reply to Marslen-Wilson and Tyler.
A PDP Approach to Set Size Effects Within the Stroop Task:Reply to Kanne,Balota,Spieler,and Faust (1998)
Stroop Task Kanye Balota Spieler Faust
2015/6/19
In this reply, the authors point out that the simulations reported by S. M. Kanne, D. A. Balota, D. H. Spieler, and M. E. Faust (1998) did not incorporate mechanisms proposed to explain set size effec...
More Words but Still No Lexicon: Reply to Besner et al. (1990)
Still No Lexicon Reply to Besner
2015/6/19
The major points in the Besner, Twilley, McCann, and Seergobin (1990) critique of the Seidenberg and McClelland (1989) model are addressed. The model's performancediffers from that of people in ways t...
On visual and contextual factors in reading:A reply to Rayner & Slowiaczek
visual contextual factor Rayner Slowiaczek
2015/6/19
On visual and contextual factors in reading:A reply to Rayner & Slowiaczek.
Where is the Conflict between Internalism and Externalism? A Reply to Lohndal & Narita (2009)
Internalism Externalism
2015/6/11
In a recent issue of Biolinguistics, Lohndal & Narita (2009, henceforth L&N) reply
skeptically to my attempt to sketch a theory that takes both internalist and externalist
inquiry seriously (Lassite...
This discussion note is a brief response to Everett (2009, E09), which was a reply to our assessment (Nevins, Pesetsky, & Rodrigues 2009, NP&R) of Everett’s (2005,CA) earlier claims about the Amazonia...
Cyclic Linearization and its interaction with other aspects of grammar: a reply
Cyclic Linearization interaction other aspects of grammar a reply
2014/11/17
Our proposal is concerned with the relation between an aspect of phonology (linearization) and syntax.1 In the picture that we had in mind, the syntax is autonomous — "it does what it does" — but some...
We begin by summarizing our empirical and logical concerns about points 1-3. We argue that
L13's grammatical, statistical and formal claims are at best unwarranted, and in many instances
demonstr...